<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>dariusz grabka &#187; research</title>
	<atom:link href="http://grabka.org/internet/tag/research/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://grabka.org/internet</link>
	<description>sharing is caring.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 26 Jul 2010 18:56:25 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Chrisitian Rohrer&#8217;s Greatest Hits</title>
		<link>http://grabka.org/internet/2010/06/chrisitian-rohrers-greatest-hits/</link>
		<comments>http://grabka.org/internet/2010/06/chrisitian-rohrers-greatest-hits/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Jun 2010 16:49:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>dariusz</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[User Experience]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[methods]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[usability]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://grabka.org/internet/2010/06/chrisitian-rohrers-greatest-hits/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Whenever I try to frame a usability problem we have with some sort of solution, I usually get overwhelmed.  Usability research is difficult to execute well even if you know what you&#8217;re doing .. but UX is a field with an over-abundance of methods and strategies.  All of these strategies have pros, cons, proponents, and [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Whenever I try to frame a usability problem we have with some sort of solution, I usually get overwhelmed.  Usability research is difficult to execute well even if you know what you&#8217;re doing .. but UX is a field with an over-abundance of methods and strategies.  All of these strategies have pros, cons, proponents, and detractors, academic and otherwise.   Luckily every once in a while I run across a paper that attempts to frame all of these methods in some sort of matrix that I can make a business decision on. I can have a hunch, go to my manager, point at graph, say &#8220;we should do 2 of these.&#8221;   <a href="http://www.xdstrategy.com/about/" target="_blank">Christian Rohrer</a>&#8216;s presentation to BayCHI is one of those useful papers.</p>
<div class="wp-caption aligncenter" style="width: 452px"><img style="max-width: 800px;" title="Slide about quantifying desirability - Like whoa ..." src="http://grabka.org/internet/wp-content/uploads/2010/06/desirability.png" alt="desirability matrix" width="442" height="334" /><p class="wp-caption-text">Slide about quantifying desirability - Like whoa ...</p></div>
<p>His <a href="http://www.xdstrategy.com/2009/01/14/presenting-at-baychi-christians-greatest-hits/" target="_blank">original presentation and blog article</a> have links to <a href="http://www.xdstrategy.com/wp-content/uploads/User_Research_and_Desirability_BayCHI2009-Final-public.pdf" target="_blank">the PDF</a>, as well as a link to <a href="http://www.rosenfeldmedia.com/webinars/user-research/" target="_blank">buying the presentation</a> for $70 or so.  We watched the presentation at work and it&#8217;s &#8230; not great for a group audience.  The slides read better than they are presented, but I can&#8217;t fault Christian for this .. just the sheer amount of <em>good content</em> is overwhelming.</p>
<blockquote><p>User Experience Leader Christian Rohrer provides a framework for understanding and explaining different user research methods, delves into details on a few of the lesser-known methods, such as desirability and true intent studies, and discusses key insights to succeed in modern-day corporate environments.</p></blockquote>
<p><a href="http://www.xdstrategy.com/wp-content/uploads/User_Research_and_Desirability_BayCHI2009-Final-public.pdf" target="_blank">PDF download</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://grabka.org/internet/2010/06/chrisitian-rohrers-greatest-hits/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Finding research papers online</title>
		<link>http://grabka.org/internet/2008/03/finding-research-papers-online/</link>
		<comments>http://grabka.org/internet/2008/03/finding-research-papers-online/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Mar 2008 23:41:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>dariusz</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Masters Research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[finding papers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[research]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://grabka.org/internet/?p=18</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Finding relevant and useful research papers is different now than even a few years ago.  Search tools are improving, online collections are growing, and your local university library probably has a proxy that allows you to vist any paper they have access to online.  I have found the following tools useful in finding papers within [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Finding relevant and useful research papers is different now than even a few years ago.  Search tools are improving, online collections are growing, and your local university library probably has a proxy that allows you to vist any paper they have access to online.  I have found the following tools useful in finding papers within the domain of Computer Science.</p>
<p>Google  <a title="google scholar" href="http://scholar.google.com/">Scholar</a>, at least amongst my peer group, doesn&#8217;t need an introduction.  The quality of its results,  the listing of authors on the left hand side, and one click access to &#8220;Recent articles&#8221; makes it my default search.  But I regularly dip into Live Search, ACM Portal, and (less often) CiteSeer to get a more comprehensive list of papers.</p>
<p><a title="live search academic" href="http://academic.live.com">Live Search Academic</a>, the offering from Microsoft, has a very neat interface that allows you to quickly preview the abstracts of the papers in your result set by hovering over them with your mouse.   In addition to searching by relevance (default), number of citations, and by author, you can group by an author (very useful), journal (neat), and conference (sounds useful .. isn&#8217;t).  The hover-over BibTex citation export is very quick and simple.</p>
<p><a href="http://portal.acm.org">ACM Portal</a> is most useful for me on campus, as the articles are downloadable when my IP is in the range that the Library uses.  As far as finding <strong>most recent</strong> research, Portal beats both Scholar and Live, hands down.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://grabka.org/internet/2008/03/finding-research-papers-online/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
